People lead
Accountable for workforce, skills and learning.
- Often held by
- an HR director or chief people officer, with learning and development
- Accountable for
- 10 controls
- Contributes to
- 11 controls
- Relies on
- Delivery lead (5), Business owner (5), Executive sponsor (4), AI governance lead (3), Security lead (2), Risk lead (1)
- Supports
- Executive sponsor (4), AI governance lead (3), Business owner (2), Delivery lead (2)
Accountable for
This role answers for each of these controls reaching the level the organisation has set, and holds the evidence.
AI literacy for all staff
Everyone in the organisation has a baseline understanding of what AI is, what it can and cannot do, and how to use it safely under the organisation's policy.
With: AI governance lead, Security lead.
Evidence an assessor would expect
- The literacy baseline or curriculum, with an owner and review date
- Completion records by group
- Results of knowledge checks or surveys
- Literacy completion records for contractors who operate AI
- AI security content in the literacy baseline and recent threat updates
Leadership capability
Leaders understand AI well enough to set direction for it, question proposals and risks, and make informed decisions about its use.
With: Executive sponsor.
Evidence an assessor would expect
- The leadership learning offer and attendance records
- Board or committee minutes showing informed challenge on AI
Specialist roles and careers
The organisation defines the specialist AI roles it needs, with career paths and a professional community that help people grow and stay.
With: Delivery lead.
Evidence an assessor would expect
- Role profiles and career framework for AI specialists
- Professional community terms of reference or activity records
Skills assessment
The organisation knows which AI skills it has and which it needs, by role and group, and uses this to plan learning, recruitment and workforce decisions.
With: Business owner, Delivery lead.
Evidence an assessor would expect
- A skills framework or needs analysis for AI by role
- Skills assessment results and the resulting plan
Role-based learning
People can get learning matched to what their role needs to do with AI, beyond the baseline for all staff, and use it in their work.
With: Business owner, Delivery lead, Security lead.
Evidence an assessor would expect
- Role-based learning pathways and the needs they address
- Uptake records and evaluation results
- Learning records for people with AI risk duties, including contractors
- AI security in learning pathways for builders, operators, buyers and security staff
Workforce planning for AI
The expected effect of AI on roles, numbers and skills is planned for openly, with affected staff and their representatives informed and involved, and decisions made fairly.
With: Executive sponsor, Business owner, Risk lead.
Evidence an assessor would expect
- Workforce plans showing the expected effect of AI
- Records of consultation or engagement with staff and representatives
- Reskilling or redeployment records and outcome monitoring
Bringing in and keeping expertise
The organisation recruits and keeps the AI expertise it needs and uses external experts in a way that transfers knowledge, so that capability stays when contracts end.
With: Delivery lead, Executive sponsor.
Evidence an assessor would expect
- Recruitment and retention plan or data for AI roles
- Knowledge transfer clauses or records from external engagements
Support for staff using AI
People using AI day to day can get practical help, current guidance and answers to their questions quickly from a known place.
With: Delivery lead, AI governance lead.
Evidence an assessor would expect
- The support route and guidance, with update dates
- Support request data or logs showing common themes and actions
- Tool guidance stating limitations, failure modes and residual risks
Staff and representative engagement
Staff and their representatives, including trade unions where present, are involved early in decisions about AI that affect their work, and their input is considered and answered.
With: Business owner, Executive sponsor.
Evidence an assessor would expect
- Engagement records or minutes from staff and representative meetings about AI
- Examples of designs or decisions changed after staff input
Champions and communities
Networks of champions and communities of practice, with time and support to do so, spread know-how about AI and good practice across the organisation.
With: AI governance lead, Business owner.
Evidence an assessor would expect
- Champion role description and a list of champions by area
- Community of practice meeting records or activity data
Contributes to
Another role is accountable; this one does part of the work or supplies what it needs.
Stakeholder input to strategy
Staff, their representatives, service users, partners and, where relevant, the public and regulators have a real opportunity to shape the AI strategy, and the organisation can show what changed as a result.
Accountable: Executive sponsor.
Oversight forum
A cross-functional forum oversees AI use, risk and performance, with terms of reference, the right membership and a clear link to the organisation's main governance.
Accountable: AI governance lead.
Ethical principles in practice
The organisation has adopted ethical principles for AI and applies them through a working review route that can change or stop a use of AI.
Accountable: AI governance lead.
Human oversight proportionate to risk
Each use of AI has human oversight designed to match its risk, stating who reviews, at which point, and with what authority to override or stop it.
Accountable: Business owner.
Target operating model for AI
The organisation has a defined, approved operating model that states who builds, buys, runs and supports AI, and what is done centrally and what locally.
Accountable: Executive sponsor.
Delivery standards for AI
AI work is delivered by multidisciplinary teams using user-centred methods to defined delivery standards.
Accountable: Delivery lead.
Unapproved AI tools
Use of unapproved AI tools is detected, and people using them are steered to an approved alternative or a route to get their need met.
Accountable: Delivery lead.
Planned approach to AI change
AI adoption is managed as organisational change, with a change plan, named sponsors and the resources to carry it out.
Accountable: Executive sponsor.
Internal communication about AI
Staff receive clear, honest and regular communication about what AI is being used for, why, and what it means for them.
Accountable: Executive sponsor.
Safe to raise concerns
Anyone can raise a concern or report a problem with AI without fear of blame, and can see what was done about it.
Accountable: AI governance lead.
Adoption support for affected teams
Teams whose work changes because of AI get practical support through the change, and actual adoption is tracked against what was planned.
Accountable: Business owner.