Risk, Ethics & Compliance ยท RSK-06
Fairness and bias management
Unfair bias is identified, tested for and reduced at each stage of a use of AI, from design through to live operation.
Why it matters
AI can reproduce or amplify unfairness present in its data, its design or how it is used, and the effect often falls on groups already at a disadvantage. Bias needs managing across the lifecycle because it can appear after go-live as data and users change.
Levels
| 0 Absent | Confirmed absent: the evidence shows nothing is in place. Not known is recorded as insufficient evidence, not 0. |
|---|---|
| 1 Initial | Bias is not considered, or is assumed not to be present. |
| 2 Developing | Bias is considered for some uses, usually at design, but testing is informal and live use is not checked. |
| 3 Defined | A documented fairness approach defines groups and measures for each in-scope use, tests before release, records mitigations and proxies, and monitors fairness in live use. |
| 4 Managed | Fairness breaches in live use lead to investigation, root-cause analysis and action, and fairness results are reported to the oversight forum. |
| 5 Optimising | Fairness methods are improved from monitoring results and external developments, and lessons are shared across uses. |
Level 3 criteria
Level 3 is met when every applicable criterion is met. Criteria marked with an overlay apply only to organisations with that characteristic (overlays).
- RSK-06.1 A documented approach to fairness and bias is applied across the organisation.
- RSK-06.2 For each in-scope use of AI, the groups at risk and the fairness measures that matter are defined.
- RSK-06.3 Each in-scope use of AI is tested for fairness before release.
- RSK-06.4 Fairness mitigations are recorded for each in-scope use of AI.
- RSK-06.5 Fairness is monitored in live use through MON-02.
- RSK-06.6 Proxies for protected characteristics are identified, and any use of them is recorded with reasons.
Assessment questions
- For a given use of AI, which groups could be treated unfairly, and how was that worked out?
- What testing for bias is done before release, and against what measures?
- How would you know if a live use started producing unfair results?
- The documented approach to fairness and bias
- Bias test results and mitigation records for recent uses
- Live fairness monitoring reports
How to reach Level 3
- Write a fairness approach for the organisation explaining how groups at risk are identified, how fairness measures are chosen and how testing is done.
- For each in-scope use, define the groups at risk and the fairness measures that matter, and identify proxies for protected characteristics, recording any use of them with reasons.
- Test against the chosen measures before release and record the mitigations applied.
- Hand the fairness measures to live monitoring (MON-02) so they are tracked in use.
Common pitfalls
- Testing only overall accuracy, which can hide poor results for smaller groups.
- Removing protected characteristics but ignoring proxies that carry the same information.
Starter artefacts
- Fairness approach document
- Per-use fairness test plan and results record
Ownership and sequence
- Accountable
- business owner
- Contributors
- data owner, delivery lead, risk lead
- Depends on
- RSK-03
- Roadmap step
- 5
- Lifecycle
- design, acquire_build, deploy, operate
Cross-references
| Algorithmic Transparency Recording Standard | Tier 2 Development data specification partial; Tier 2 Risks, mitigations and impact assessments partial |
|---|---|
| EU AI Act | Art 26(4) partial; Art 9 partial; Art 10 partial |
| GDS AI Playbook | P2 partial |
| ISO/IEC 42001 | A.5.4 partial |
| JSP 936 Part 1 | para 49a partial; para 49d direct; para 52 partial; para 69 direct; para 70 partial; para 71 partial |
| MITRE AI Maturity Model | P1.3 direct; P4.2 direct; P5.3 partial; P6.2 partial |
| NIST AI 600-1 | R6 direct |
| NIST AI RMF 1.0 | MEASURE 1.1 partial; MEASURE 2.11 direct |
| UK Data and AI Ethics Framework | Fairness 1 direct; Fairness 2 direct; Fairness 3 direct; SAT 1.13 direct; SAT 2.7 direct; SAT 2.8 direct; SAT 3.1 partial; SAT 3.2 direct |
| UNESCO AI Maturity Framework | 4.2 partial; 5.2 direct; 5.3 partial |
direct: this control at Level 3 meets the item. partial: it covers part of it.