Governance & Accountability ยท GOV-01
AI policy
The organisation has an approved AI policy that states which uses of AI are permitted, which need approval and which are not allowed, and keeps it current.
Why it matters
Without a policy, staff either avoid AI entirely or use it without guardrails. A clear policy is the first thing people look for and the basis every other control refers to.
Levels
| 0 Absent | Confirmed absent: the evidence shows nothing is in place. Not known is recorded as insufficient evidence, not 0. |
|---|---|
| 1 Initial | No organisation-wide policy; individual teams or staff set their own rules. |
| 2 Developing | A policy or guidance note exists but is incomplete, unapproved, or not widely known. |
| 3 Defined | An approved, owned and controlled AI policy sets the scope of AI governance and which uses are permitted, need approval or are prohibited, and all staff know it. |
| 4 Managed | Policy awareness and compliance are measured; the policy is reviewed on schedule and after significant incidents or external change. |
| 5 Optimising | The policy is refined from evidence of how AI is actually used, incidents and lessons, and stays ahead of external change rather than reacting to it. |
Level 3 criteria
Level 3 is met when every applicable criterion is met. Criteria marked with an overlay apply only to organisations with that characteristic (overlays).
- GOV-01.1 An approved AI policy states which parts of the organisation, uses and systems AI governance covers.
- GOV-01.2 The policy states which uses of AI are permitted, which need approval and which are prohibited.
- GOV-01.3 The policy's prohibited uses include the practices that the law bans.
- GOV-01.4 The policy has a named owner and a review date.
- GOV-01.5 The policy has been communicated to all staff.
- GOV-01.6 The policy and its supporting governance documents are approved, version-controlled and retained.
- GOV-01.7 Acceptable use terms are set for users of AI services the organisation offers to others, and are reviewed. PRV
- GOV-01.8 Breaches of the acceptable use terms by users of the organisation's AI services are acted on. PRV
Assessment questions
- Is there an AI policy approved at the right level, and when was it last reviewed?
- Does it distinguish uses that are permitted, need approval, and are not allowed?
- How would a member of staff find it, and how do you know they have?
- The approved policy, with owner, approval record and review date
- Communication or training records showing staff were told about it
- Change history showing reviews have happened
- A stated scope for AI governance, and version control and retention for governance documents
- Practices banned by law included in the prohibited list
How to reach Level 3
- Write a policy that states what AI governance covers (which parts of the organisation, which uses and which systems) and sorts uses into permitted, approval-required and prohibited, with practices banned by law listed as prohibited.
- Where the organisation offers AI services to others, set acceptable use terms for those users and decide how they are enforced and reviewed.
- Name a policy owner and review date, get the policy approved, and keep it and its supporting governance documents under version control and retention.
- Communicate the policy to all staff and check they know where to find it (see PPL-01 and GOV-08).
Common pitfalls
- Writing a policy that lists principles but never says which uses are allowed, need approval or are banned.
- Letting supporting documents drift out of version control so nobody knows which is current.
Starter artefacts
- AI policy template with scope, permitted, approval-required and prohibited uses
- Acceptable use terms for external users of AI services
- Governance document register with versions and retention
Ownership and sequence
- Accountable
- executive sponsor
- Contributors
- ai governance lead, risk lead, security lead
- Depends on
- GOV-02
- Roadmap step
- 2
- Lifecycle
- strategy, design, operate
Cross-references
| AI Cyber Security Code of Practice | 4.5 partial |
|---|---|
| EU AI Act | Art 5 partial; Art 17 partial |
| GDS AI Playbook | P10 partial |
| ISO/IEC 42001 | 4.3 direct; 5.2 direct; 7.5 direct; A.2.2 direct; A.2.4 direct; A.9.2 partial |
| JSP 936 Part 1 | para 15 direct |
| MITRE AI Maturity Model | P1.1 partial; P2.1 partial; P2.3 partial |
| NIST AI 600-1 | R1 partial; R3 partial; R10 partial; R11 partial |
| NIST AI RMF 1.0 | GOVERN 1.2 partial; GOVERN 1.4 partial |
| UK Data and AI Ethics Framework | Accountability 9 partial |
| UNESCO AI Maturity Framework | 5.1 direct |
direct: this control at Level 3 meets the item. partial: it covers part of it.